If you were therefore wondering whether SARS has outsourced some of its debt collecting activities to some players in the private sector, the simple answer is yes.
On 22 September 2015, SARS presented its strategic and annual performance plans to the National Council of Provinces Finance Committee. During this presentation, it was mentioned that tax to the tune of R97bn was due to the State, and that a special project was underway to recover these funds. The minutes of that meeting recorded that collection of some of the debt would be outsourced to debt collection agencies.
A request for proposal (RFP) was then published on 9 October 2015 to solicit tender proposals. The RFP stresses that SARS will only outsource the collection of debt older than four years (for a total of R15bn). It adds that "from time to time SARS will also embark on outsourcing certain categories of debt to the pre-approved debt collection agencies on its panel". In other words, the success of this endeavour may encourage SARS gradually to outsource the recovery of a greater portion of the overall debt.
The successful bidders are appointed for an initial period of 36 months, which could later be extended by an additional 12 months. Thirty-nine companies applied for the current tender, and three were successful: Credit Solutions, NDS Credit Management and Lekgotla Trifecta Capital Consortium.
The RFP indicates that these agencies must adhere to the following process when engaging with a person owing SARS:
The agencies must also provide SARS with a monthly report containing, among others, information about the taxpayers contacted by letter and phone call, payments made by these taxpayers, payment promises or arrangements, and returns promised to be submitted. The report must also list those taxpayers still on the list who are found to be deceased, as well as those who are unable to pay because they untraceable, or have been liquidated or sequestrated.
SARS has availed its taxpayer database to the agencies in order to allow them adequately to perform their mandated required functions. Importantly, the debt collectors were required to sign an oath of secrecy, where they had to declare not to disclose taxpayer information to any non-SARS officials. They also agreed to potential criminal prosecution should they violate this clause. This strict condition should give taxpayers some degree of peace of mind.
