
![]() |
Restraint of trade agreements: Blanket ban backfires in Labour CourtIt’s not uncommon for businesses to want to stop former employees from joining a competitor. But just having a restraint-of-trade clause in a contract doesn’t mean it will hold up in court. A recent Labour Court case shows how these clauses can backfire, especially when there’s no clear evidence that the business is at risk. ![]() Image source: Elnur Amikishiyev – 123RF.com What happened?MSA Outsourcing Solutions, a company that supplies remote staff to international clients, tried to stop two former employees from working at a competitor, Exclusive Prep. The employees, who had been service agents, were now working in senior roles at the new company. MSA claimed they could hurt its business by taking clients or using confidential information. MSA asked the court to urgently stop them from working at Exclusive Prep or contacting MSA clients or staff. But the court wasn’t convinced. What the court saidThe judge dismissed the case and ordered MSA to pay the legal costs. Here’s why:
What this means for HR and legal teamsThis case is a good reminder that restraint-of-trade clauses aren’t a catch-all. If you want to protect your business, you need to:
Ensure your contracts stand up in courtIt’s tempting to treat restraint clauses like a safety net. But they only work if they’re fair, focused, and backed by evidence. If your business is serious about protecting itself, make sure your contracts and internal processes are doing the real work. If you're unsure whether your current contracts would stand up in court – or you're facing a potential risk, it’s important to seek advice to review and update your contracts. About the authorRiona Kalua is the Head of Employment Practice at LnP Beyond Legal. |