Fica compliance risks for law firms: 5 red flags

Photo by Bernd Dittrich on Unsplash

This traditional approach drains valuable billable hours from legal professionals and, more critically, exposes firms to potentially crippling penalties. With South Africa losing almost R3.3bn to financial crime in 2023 alone, the urgency for robust, technologically driven compliance measures has never been greater in an industry being heavily targeted by money launderers.

Fica compliance, in general, has reached unprecedented criticality, particularly since South Africa’s addition to the Financial Action Task Force (FATF) grey list, and the country’s aspirations to be removed from the list with mere months to go. With still present concerns over the nation's anti-money laundering and counter-terrorist financing measures, the Financial Intelligence Centre’s (FIC's) ramped up inspections aren’t showing signs of slowing down.

Notably, in 2023/24, the FIC conducted 558 inspections, of which half were specifically targeted at legal practitioners, making them the most scrutinised sector.

The repercussions of non-compliance are serious. The high-profile case of Kunene Ramapala Inc. which incurred a R7.7m fine for failing to implement adequate customer due diligence, serves as a potent reminder. Despite appealing the hefty penalty, the Johannesburg-based law firm was found guilty of neglecting to scrutinise clients against the Targeted Financial Sanctions list and failing to develop a robust Risk Management and Compliance Programme (RMCP).

This case underscores that non-compliance, whether due to negligence or malicious intent, carries significant financial and reputational risks.

Corporate & Commercial Law

Are you flouting Fica? Sarb cracks down on non-compliance

Sameer Kumandan  4 Dec 2024

Spotting the red flags in legal practice

Given the severe consequences, law firms simply must sharpen their ability to detect warning signs. These are not always obvious and can often be subtle behavioural or transactional cues that, when combined, signal illicit activity:

1. Vague or evasive funding: Clients who are unclear about the source of their funds, or whose funds originate from unrelated third parties.
2. Cash-only transactions: An insistence on cash payments or attempts to deposit and quickly withdraw large sums from a law firm's trust account.
3. Complex entity structures: Requests to establish intricate legal entities that are, in fact, designed to obscure asset ownership or facilitate illicit transactions.
4. Fraudulent documentation: Attempts to have the law firm validate, process, or submit documents that appear altered or inauthentic.
5. Suspicious asset transactions: Involvement in the purchase or sale of high-value assets (luxury cars, antiques, property) where the economic logic is unclear, or assets are titled under third parties to hide true ownership.

These indicators are rarely self-evident, and rarely isolated. They frequently emerge as a combination of risk behaviours, demanding a sophisticated and proactive approach to client due diligence.

The digital and technology-fuelled landscape of financial crime is intensifying, with digital banking fraud, for instance, surging by 45% and related financial losses rising by 47% in South Africa (Sabric Annual Crime Statistics 2023). This highlights how criminals are leveraging advanced technology and even creating highly convincing deepfakes, manipulated documents, and intricate schemes that render traditional detection methods increasingly inadequate – especially for law firms.

Legislation & Regulation

What you need to know about the new Fica provisions now in force

Lerato Lamola and Christopher Williamson  24 Aug 2023

How technology transforms Fica compliance

While Fica mandates essential measures like FIC registration, appointing a compliance officer, and developing an RMCP, relying on manual processes for it all means it is inherently cumbersome and prone to error. Lawyers are trained in law, not in complex compliance administration; these tasks do not constitute billable hours and often detract from core legal work; yet form part of core risk management.

Modern technology fundamentally changes this dynamic, transforming compliance from an operational burden into a streamlined safeguard:

• Automated identity verification & document checks: Reduces human error and significantly speeds up client onboarding by instantly verifying identities and authenticating documents. For enhanced security and a seamless client experience, digital identity verification solutions are now essential tools for all accountable institutions.
• Real-time risk monitoring: Moves beyond static, one-time checks to continuous client monitoring, providing immediate alerts for sanctions, politically exposed persons (PEPs) and adverse media mentions. This allows firms to reassess risk dynamically, even if a client's risk profile changes post-onboarding. With the right technology, businesses can automate and streamline their compliance processes.
• Digital audit trails: Creates a comprehensive, immutable record of all compliance actions, making it easier to demonstrate adherence during FIC inspections and appeals.
• Enhanced due diligence capabilities: Technology is accessible that leverages advanced analytics, identity triangulation, and biometric liveness detection to provide deeper insights into client legitimacy and flag potential synthetic identities.

In a regulatory environment where vigilance is non-negotiable, digital compliance tools have become the law firm’s best defence – and most efficient ally. By modernising their compliance strategy, law firms can not only avoid substantial Fica penalties and operational disruption but also unlock significant efficiencies, bolster their reputation, and cultivate long-term trust with legitimate clients.